By David Paulsen, Episcopal News Service
Al Ahli Arab Hospital, a ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem that serves patients in Gaza, was hit Oct. 17 by an apparent airstrike, adding to an already volatile situation in the Palestinian territory as Israeli soldiers prepare for an expected ground assault on the militant group Hamas.
The Palestinian Health Ministry put the initial death toll at 500 or more people, though it wasn’t clear how it reached that estimate. The ministry is run by Hamas, which has controlled the territory since 2007.
Diana Branton, a spokeswoman for the United States-based American Friends of the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem, or AFEDJ, told Episcopal News Service that the hospital’s courtyard was hit, but little other information was immediately available. “We have confirmation that Ahli was struck. We do not have a confirmation of actual casualty counts,” Branton said. The hospital’s courtyard “is where many of the [Palestinian] refugees were staying.”
Israeli airstrikes have been a regular threat in the Palestinian territory since Oct. 7 in response to a surprise attack by Hamas, in which gunmen massacred hundreds of Israelis in a coordinated land, sea and air attack on Israeli soil. Hamas also has fired its own rockets into Israel.
The Ahli hospital is one of 22 hospitals in the northern region of Gaza struggling to remain open to treat patients after Israel tightened its blockade of the territory, ordered an evacuation to the southern end of the Gaza Strip and deployed soldiers to Gaza’s northern border. Gaza, with about 2.3 million people confined to about 140 square miles, is one of the most densely populated places in the world, and many of its residents had been sheltering around the hospitals seeking safety from Israeli airstrikes.
Photos of the Ahli hospital on Oct. 17 showed its facilities engulfed in flames and scattered with broken glass and body parts, according to an Associated Press report. It quoted an Israeli military spokesman who had only preliminary information. “We will get the details and update the public,” Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari said. “I don’t know to say whether it was an Israeli airstrike.”
The New York Times later quoted an Israeli military statement that blamed the airstrike on an errant rocket fired by Islamic Jihad, a Hamas ally, not an Israeli rocket.
The initial Oct. 7 attack by Hamas and subsequent airstrikes by the militant group and the Israeli military reportedly have killed thousands of Israelis and Palestinians so far. The damage to the Ahli hospital occurred on a global day of prayer and fasting that was called by the heads of the 13 Christian denominations in the Holy Land, including the Anglican province that includes the Diocese of Jerusalem.
Episcopal leaders also are encouraging Episcopalians to donate to American Friends of the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem, which supports the Ahli hospital.
The Ahli hospital sustained damages from a previous strike, which hit its cancer unit. Four staff members were injured in the Oct. 14 strike, which damaged two upper floors, according to AFEDJ. An earlier strike destroyed the house of the hospital’s medical director.
– David Paulsen is a senior reporter and editor for Episcopal News Service. He can be reached at [email protected].
Update: The evidence that this was a rocket probably from Islamic Jihad, rather than a bomb, has grown since this was filed,. Here’s what I liked on facebook
From an Israeli journo I respect https://www.timesofisrael.com/haters-wont-be-swayed-but…/
From an analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute https://twitter.com/Nrg8000/status/1714535497958334678
You should change the headline – reported by whom? Hamas.
Airstrike reflects both possibilities rocket or bombing. If you go to the facebook page you will see i have linked reports from Times of Israel and an Australian Expert thay reflect the growing evidence it was a rocket.
No, not correct. A failing rocket is not an ‘airstrike’. An airstrike means an attack by a belligerent.
Well, let’s agree it almost certainly was an Islamic Jihad rocket. The headline was not mine, BTW but the news agency’s. This story was written just as the Israeli analysis was becoming available. As I said to another commenter, the IDF material could have been higher up in the story.
To be clear, ‘apparent airstrike’ are the words of Hamas, and the US believes it was a Hamas rocket, as film indicates. So you shouldn’t be repeating Hamas claims.
There is no evidence at all of “an apparent airstrike”. It is overwhelmingly clear that the fire in the carpark (the hospital was not struck) was caused by the failure of a rocket fired from the adjacent cemetery by Palestinian Islamic Jihad against Israel. You should reflect this in your reporting and remove this misleading news item.