1

Where Did Gen X Go? How a get-it-done ethos left a gap in public, sacrificial leadership

Adam Burt

I’m a Gen Xer. We were raised to let ourselves in after school, make a sandwich, and crack on. Independence, pragmatism, self-reliance – we wear those like a uniform. We don’t need a parade. We just get stuff done.

Those strengths have served many of us brilliantly in private life. But there’s a shadow side: a reluctance to step onto the public stage and carry vision for others. We’ve preferred the engine room to the bridge. In civic life that has consequences. Look around the Anglophone world and you’ll notice a peculiar absence at the visible apex of politics: voters choosing between ageing Boomers and not-yet-seasoned Millennials, while the middle child – Gen X – is under-represented at the top.

Before anyone reaches for pitchforks or memes, a few realities. Yes, Gen X is a smaller cohort than Boomers and Millennials. Yes, Boomers held on longer than expected. Yes, the pipeline to public leadership is slow, often perverse, and not always built on merit. All true. But structure isn’t the whole story. Culture matters too – and our culture leans heavily toward “head down, don’t big-note yourself.” In workplaces that’s admirable. In public life it can look like abdication.

If you’re a Christian, the bar for leadership isn’t visibility – it’s service. Jesus reframed authority as self-giving: “whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant.” That’s not a call to grandstanding; it’s a summons to shoulder the cost for the good of others. Sacrificial leadership is public-minded by definition. It doesn’t demand the spotlight, but it doesn’t refuse responsibility when it’s needed either.

Here’s the uncomfortable possibility: our Gen X instincts – autonomy, low-drama competence, suspicion of hype – may have kept us from stepping up precisely when we were most needed. We mistook reluctance to self-promote for humility, and we mistook staying out of the fray for virtue. In doing so, we left space for either very old leaders to keep carrying the load or very young leaders to be thrust forward before they were ready. Neither outcome is ideal. A healthy polity needs a “bridge” generation in its prime – seasoned enough to be steady, young enough to be energetic, principled enough to absorb the hits. That’s meant to be us.

This isn’t a scolding; it’s a stocktake. Gen X brings real gifts to leadership: resilience born of disruption, the ability to translate between analogue and digital worlds, a bias for execution over theatrics, and an allergy to utopian nonsense. If we coupled those with a willingness to own the costly, public side of service, we could steady institutions that currently swing between nostalgia and novelty.

So what’s in the way?

  • We confuse humility with invisibility. True humility is using your gifts for others without needing credit. It isn’t hiding your gifts so you can’t be criticised.
  • We prefer fixing to fronting. Someone has to front. Casting vision, taking heat, making the call – that’s part of serving. If principle-driven people avoid that work, don’t be surprised when less principled people do it instead.
  • We’ve grown comfortable. Many of us built decent lives away from the spotlight. The trade-off is that public leadership is time-consuming, thankless and costly. Precisely. That’s why it’s called sacrifice.

A word to Christians as well: we often prize doctrinal accuracy (good!) but are light on preparing people for public service (not good). If our discipleship never names civic responsibility as a legitimate arena for loving our neighbour, we shouldn’t be shocked when capable Christians never consider it. Head and heart. Exegesis and application. Truth and courage.

What would stepping up look like – without selling our souls to hype?

  • Choose responsibility over commentary. Run for council. Serve on the board you usually critique. Take the portfolio no one wants. Lead the boring reform that actually helps people.
  • Bring your execution bias into the open. Translate your “engine room” competence into public-facing clarity: set measurable goals, publish timelines, report honestly, own mistakes.
  • Model servant authority. Praise the team, absorb the blame, tell the truth plainly, and refuse the grubby shortcuts. People notice the rare combination of competence and character.
  • Mentor both ways. Receive the energy and moral urgency of younger leaders; lend them your ballast. Bridge-building is a generational gift Gen X can give.

If you’re waiting to feel worthy, you’ll wait forever. Leadership is not about being the cleverest person in the room; it’s about being the person who will take the hit for the room. Our moment isn’t gone, but it is finite. Boomers are finally exiting stage left. Millennials are queueing at stage right. If Gen X has something distinctive to contribute – and I believe we do – now is the time to walk to centre stage, not for applause, but to serve.

In the end, this isn’t really about generations. It’s about stewardship. Each of us has a slice of time, influence and skill to lay down for others. The Christian frame simply names that reality and dignifies it: authority as sacrifice, not privilege. If Gen X can marry our quiet competence to that public-minded courage, we might yet fill the void – not with fanfare, but with faithful presence. And that would be leadership worth following.

Image Credit: Cmglee / Wikimedia

One Comment

  1. The apparent non-visibility of Generation X coincided with Gen X being sidelined by two powerful demographic forces. Gen X also coincided with the rise of Feminism (1965-1980). This was the peak of highly assertive if not aggressive feminism who demanded access to the “man’s world”. Irrespective of your view on this notion of equality, history shows they were successful.
    In the USA, 2018 is regarded as the year that for the first time women outnumbered men in the workforce. This naturally meant there were less jobs and places of influence for Gen X men who in prior generations, would otherwise would have filled those places. Additionally in the period from 1980, immigration increased. Without placing a judgment on immigration (that’s another topic) this meant an influx of Baby Boomer migrants, again filling the places and roles Gen X men and women would otherwise have grown into. These two forces caused a hollowing out of the Gen X era. Immigration which focussed on work-able skilled Boomer migrants therefore exaggerated the baby boomer workforce population at a time Gen X would normally have filled.

    Gen X therefore had to build a life somewhat behind the scenes. We do see a cohort of the older Boomers continuing to occupy top positions of influence, only just beginning to step into retirement, but longer life spans and Government policy allowing people to work longer, is slowing what otherwise would be a mass Baby Boomer retirement.

    The curious outcome however is that rather than this being Gen X’s time, they have been somewhat bypassed (again). This time Gen X was bypassed by a culture of employing and promoting young people more rapidly than any time in history. This has seen people in their mid 20’s promoted to CEO positions in secular world (bypassing Gen X) and to leadership in Christianity too. The manifestation of this younger focus in Christian circles has occurred for different reasons than the secular world. Studies on the falling church attendance, identified a need to change the tradition of older people occupying leadership positions in churches. These studies revealed that growing churches, most prominently demonstrated by the Pentecostal movement, were growing because they gave access to the leadership pathway to younger people – pragmatically this made sense as without youth, a church will age and close, as many churches were and are still. In mega churches and large churches, the Service Pastors were appointed in their mid twenties from the cohort of Youth group leaders. Senior volunteers were Boomers, with Gen X invisible volunteering behind the scenes doing the indispensable heavy lifting of logistics, processes and procedures which kept churches running. But it was the Youth leaders who had the prominence Gen X should otherwise have held. Looking around in a church there are not many people in their 40s in leadership. The Boomers still fill the top ranks of Ministers, Bishops and senior administrators, with the next layer being those aged under 40, and mostly under 35 years. Churches do not place much focus if any on Gen X as MTS (Ministry Trainee Students), the Trainee Ministry programs are in the 18 – 25 age group, with essentially a ten year ministry apprenticeship. Even in the face of a shortage of Ministers, the programs do not consider those Gen X who are now 45 – 60 years. Gen X are uniquely positioned, it is true, to bridge the analogue and digital world, but digital has moved so far so fast, that industry and church seek those born into the digital world, the Millennials.

    The secular world can make its own decisions. The Church however needs to fill the hollowed out middle by taking another look at Gen X and the contribution they can make.

Comments are closed.